W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: GULP 5.7, was: GULP 5.6 vs issue UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (65)

From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:57:46 -0400
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF402134C7.DB31113C-ON85256EB3.005D28DE-85256EB3.005D3748@us.ibm.com>
I agree with that fix.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote on 06/14/2004 11:19:05 AM:

> Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> > ...
> >   The "lock-root" of the new lock is the request-URL. If at the time 
of
> >   the request, the request-URL is not mapped to a resource, a new
> >   resource with no content MUST be created by the request.
>  > ...
> 
> Stefan (rightfully) points out that this should say "...with empty 
> content...". "No content" might be interpreted as defining that a GET on 

> that resource would return a 404, which is not what we want.
> 
> Is everybody ok with thst minor change?
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 12:58:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT