W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: GULP 5.6 vs issue UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (65)

From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:52:30 -0400
To: nnw3c-dist-auth___at___w3.org@smallcue.com
Cc:
Message-ID: <OF42489894.EE5A9D61-ON85256EA6.001A53BC-85256EA6.001AC6C5@us.ibm.com>

On Monday, 05/31/2004 at 07:17 AST, Geoffrey M Clemm/Lexington/IBM@IBMUS 
wrote:
> Changing back is fine with me. 

Also fine with me.

Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2004 00:53:00 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Reschke: "LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY vs RFC2518bis-05"
Previous message: Geoffrey M Clemm: "Re: GULP 5.6 vs issue UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (65)"
Maybe in reply to: Julian Reschke: "GULP 5.6 vs issue UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (65)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT