On Apr 5, 2004, at 21:18, Julian Reschke wrote: > And of course it's possible (or actually likely) that we missed > something. That's why we're asking for feedback; and the most > efficient way to get feedback is by last-calling the document in the > working group (the fact that we're having this discussion sort of > proves it, right?). So as long as we're getting *new* questions, it's > fine to delay the last-call; however once the mail threads stop (which > they did last week), we should move on. Absolutely, you are correct. BUT, I don't see any reason to last call the document before *I* at least understand the issues and misunderstandings and what ever between you and Lisa regarding locking and binding. See separate mail. Else I will as chair just get the same arguments again. But, message is received. pafReceived on Monday, 5 April 2004 15:37:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT