W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Please submit last call on draft-ietf-webdav-bind-05.txt

From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 07:25:30 -0400
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF850855B6.3598E1C6-ON85256E6D.003E1936-85256E6D.003EB194@us.ibm.com>

In my view, yes, two parties which only read the text in the
spec (and the normative document it extends, i.e. RFC2518),
will be able to write code independent of each other that
interoperates.

Since only one expert group member has had concerns in that
regard, I think it is appropriate to last call the document,
to determine whether a significant number of other readers
share that concern.

Cheers,
Geoff

Patrik wrote on 04/04/2004 03:38:12 PM:
> 
> On Apr 4, 2004, at 21:18, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> > 3) Issues with the organization and writing style of the spec. BIND 
> > adopts the same editorial style as RFC3253; and as there has been only 

> > one WG member finding problems with that, it seems that there's no 
> > change necessary. If more people feel differently about that, please 
> > speak up.
> 
> Let me phrase this differently:
> 
> Will two parties which only read the text in the spec be able to write 
> code independent of each other which interoperate?
> 
> Is your view the answer to that question is 'Yes'?
> 
>      Patrik
> 
Received on Monday, 5 April 2004 07:26:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT