W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: BIND vs RFC3253

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:38:31 +0100
Message-ID: <3FF1E247.8020207@gmx.de>
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Ted Hardie wrote:

> In general, I don't see much of a problem with indicating that a spec
> like this "updates" a previous document even if the document doesn't
> change specific items in the previous document.  Speaking personally,
> when I see "updates", I take it as "read both".  The contrast is, obviously,
> with "supersedes" which implies one can/should read only the second
> document. 
> 
> Just my take on it,
> 			regards,
> 				Ted Hardie

And "read both" is what I'd really like to express. Geoff?


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 15:39:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT