W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: BIND vs RFC3253

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:54:56 +0100
Message-ID: <3FF1CA00.8040409@gmx.de>
To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:

> I agree that some reference to RFC3253 would be useful (e.g. something
> like "this provides a detailed description of the binding model that
> is implicit in RFC3253"), but I wouldn't say that it "updates" RFC3253,
> since it doesn't change anything in RFC3253.

Well, "updates" is the only type of link we *can* use (nothing else 
would create a forward reference in the RFC Index).

Besides, I'd say that it in fact "updates" RFC3253, because it updates 
RFC2518's descriptions for MOVE, COPY, DELETE etc in presence of 
multiple bindings. Thus, it indeed updates both RFC2518 and RFC3253.

Regards, Julian


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 13:55:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT