Re: BIND issue: references appendix

I agree with those fixes.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 12/09/2003 06:01:03 AM:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> checking the references section I note that:
> 
> 1) we should distinguish between normative and informative references,
> 2) text referring to RFC2119 is missing (probably should be added to 
> Terminology section) and
> 3) we have entries for RFC2277, RFC2616 and XML that aren't used in the 
> text.
> 
> Proposal for resolution:
> 
> 1) Replace "References" to "Normative References",
> 
> 2) Add paragraph from 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-acl-latest.
> html#rfc.section.1.2.p.2> 
> to section 1.1
> 
> 3) Remove references to RFC2277 and RFC2616, add reference to XML in 
> section 1.1.
> 
> 
> Julian
> 
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>