W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-00

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:19:08 +0100
Message-ID: <3FBF7E6C.2090104@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Cc: 'Webdav WG' <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> The OPTIONS changes are as much to find out if the server supports PATCH, as to

That doesn't require additional functionality, there's already the 
"Allow" header.

> indicate which patch formats are supported.  It's nice for clients to be able
> to discover all major optional features supported by the server in one
> OPTIONS request, rather than trying features which might not work.

Is this doesn't seem to be time-critical, I'm not sure that I see the 
benefit. Not changing OPTIONS will create less dependencies and will 
possibly make it easier to add the feature to existing servers.

Note that the proposed "OPTIONS *" functionality will not work anyway. 
Is it worth keeping the remainder?


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2003 10:22:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:28 UTC