Lisa Dusseault wrote: > The OPTIONS changes are as much to find out if the server supports PATCH, as to That doesn't require additional functionality, there's already the "Allow" header. > indicate which patch formats are supported. It's nice for clients to be able > to discover all major optional features supported by the server in one > OPTIONS request, rather than trying features which might not work. Is this doesn't seem to be time-critical, I'm not sure that I see the benefit. Not changing OPTIONS will create less dependencies and will possibly make it easier to add the feature to existing servers. Note that the proposed "OPTIONS *" functionality will not work anyway. Is it worth keeping the remainder? Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Saturday, 22 November 2003 10:22:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT