W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Review of draft-ietf-webdav-quota-02.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:52:08 +0100
Message-ID: <3FB2B998.1040400@gmx.de>
To: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Brian Korver wrote:

> On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 10:08  AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> We just reached agreement that physical disk limits should not be 
>> treated as quota, right Brian?
>>
>> Julian
> 
> 
> That's news to me.

Hmm. Then there was a misunderstanding here...:

 >> 01-C03 quota vs disk space
 >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2003JanMar/
 >> 0439.html>
 >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2003JanMar/
 >> 0460.html>
 >>
 >> The spec says that servers may expose physical disk limits as quota.
 >>
 >> a) This is incompatible with NFS from which we're borrowing the
 >> semantics (it treats disk limits as a separate property, and so 
 >should
 >> we)
 >> b) Stefan raised interesting usability issue that weren't resolved so
 >> far
 >> (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2003JanMar/
 >> 0456.html>).
 >
 >Perhaps you're still looking at an older version of the draft?
 >Addressing this issue was the biggest change between -01 and -02.


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 17:53:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT