W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Depth header in PROPPATCH method

From: Stanley Guan <stanley.guan@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:04:25 -0800
Message-ID: <142901c39d7d$ecce6d10$c5b42382@us.oracle.com>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>


This seems to say that there are some confusions among
implementers on whether a Depth on PROPPATCH is
acceptable or not!



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: RE: Depth header in PROPPATCH method

> > I'd assume that most of the servers will ignore the header upon
> > PROPPATCH, thus rejecting the message may cause interoperability
> > problems. So maybe RFC2518bis should clarify this?
> I seem to recall Lisa Dusseault talking about how painful it was for
> Exchange to implement Depth/PROPPATCH behavior, and hence I suspect there
> are some servers that do implement this capability.
> - Jim
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 13:13:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT