W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Easy-to-read deltas for rfc2518bis?

From: Stanley Guan <stanley.guan@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:06:46 -0700
Message-ID: <0f3501c394ea$31399020$c5b42382@us.oracle.com>
To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Lisa,

This is a great help!  Will let you know if I've
found out any inaccuracies in it!

Thx,

-Stanley

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>
To: "'Stanley Guan'" <stanley.guan@oracle.com>; <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:35 AM
Subject: RE: Easy-to-read deltas for rfc2518bis?


> I have an ad-hoc document here that might serve your needs:
> 
> http://www.sharemation.com/~milele/public/dav/RFC2518%20Changes.doc
> 
> It's gotten increasingly inaccurate because it's hard to
> track changes to changes to changes to RFC2518.  If you find
> any such inaccuracies and point them out to me, I will be 
> happy to fix them. 
> 
> Lisa
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stanley Guan
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:58 PM
> > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> > Subject: Easy-to-read deltas for rfc2518bis?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is there any delta history of the rfc2518bis?  Is it possible 
> > to provide something similar to:
> >     http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html
> > 
> > regarding editorial efforts to highlight what's new and 
> > what's different from the original rfc2518 in rfc218bis?
> > 
> > Thx,
> > 
> > -Stanley
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 17 October 2003 16:07:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT