W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2003

RE: DAV:getlastmodified of collections

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:08:11 +0200
To: "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCGEAOIGAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

I see.

But then we're missing the case of VERSION-CONTROL on a versionable but not
yet version-controlled resource that lives inside a versioned collection (in
which case I'd say the state of the parent collection *does* change).

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Geoffrey M Clemm
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 12:03 AM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
> Subject: RE: DAV:getlastmodified of collections
>
>
>
> I was referring to the VERSION-CONTROL bullet in Peter's
> original message, i.e. VERSION-CONTROL with a version argument
> (which always creates a new version-controlled resource).
>
> For VERSION-CONTROL without a version argument (which never
> creates a new version-controlled resource), you are correct
> that it does not affect the state of the parent collection.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
>
> Julian wrote on 09/05/2003 05:54:12 PM:
>
> >
> > > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> > > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Geoffrey M Clemm
> > > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:12 PM
> > > To: 'w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org'
> > > Subject: Re: DAV:getlastmodified of collections
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Also, MOVE (on the collections containing the source and destination).
> > > Also, COPY (on the collections containing any new resources
> > > created by the
> > > COPY).
> > > One correction: VERSION-CONTROL affects the state of the collection
> > > containing the resource being created, not on the containing workspace
> > > (unless the workspace is the collection containing the resource).
> >
> > Hm. Does it affect the state of a parent collection if it (the
> collection)
> > isn't version-controlled? In this case the state of the collection IMHO
> > doesn't (or doesn't need to) change.
> >
> > > ...
> >
> > Julian
>
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 18:08:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT