Hi, here are a few reasons why I think WebDAV should say that element ordering is irrelevant: 1) There are already existing well-deployed servers (in this case IIS) that get the ordering wrong (here: propstat content), thus clients can't rely on ordering anyway for all practical purposes, 2) Requiring a specific ordering will make protocol extensions extremely hard. For instance, take two independant extensions "A" and "B" that extend RFC2518 and add new elements to the same container element. If at a later point a new protocol revision tries to integrate both extensions, it will be hard to come up with a simple DTD that consolidates both changes. Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 09:04:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT