Am Samstag, 22.03.03, um 02:10 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Brian Korver: > > I agree that it's clear. The problem is that we defined things a > little > differently from NFS: DAV:quota-limit-bytes is different from > NFS's quota_avail_hard, in that > > DAV:quota-limit-bytes - DAV:quota-used-bytes = quota_avail_hard > > We talked about doing this because we wanted the "amount free" that > is displayed to the user to be what the user expects rather than > a value computed by the client, which might not end up as a round > number. I wonder if this equation holds true when "disk space" gets low. Say you have 10 GB of space on the server, you have 10 users and each user has a quota of 1GB. You add an 11th user also with 1GB quota (or an administrator puts a 1GB sized resource). Now, when the free space on the server goes below 1GB, the above equation will not tell you how large a file you can PUT. That problem seems to be avoided in 3010 with "quota_avail_*". //StefanReceived on Monday, 24 March 2003 03:27:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT