- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:00:04 +0100
- To: "Jason Crawford" <nn683849@smallcue.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 5:07 PM > To: Julian Reschke > Cc: 'WebDAV' > Subject: RE: Move and Delete (was: bind draft issues) > > > ... > > Julian, > would you be willing to support both in your server. If you think clients prefer > the non-atomic delete on the final binding, you could implement that for DELETE > and you'd still implement UNBIND atomicly? It's more a matter of server policy. I don't think we *want* to support the atomic UNBIND functionality when deleting the last binding to a collection. Thus our server might support UNBIND if and only if the binding being removed is not the last one. > ... -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Saturday, 8 March 2003 13:00:20 UTC