W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: Move and Delete (was: bind draft issues)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:00:04 +0100
To: "Jason Crawford" <nn683849@smallcue.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKEDFGLAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 5:07 PM
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: 'WebDAV'
> Subject: RE: Move and Delete (was: bind draft issues)
>
>
> ...
>
> Julian,
>    would you be willing to support both in your server.  If you think
clients prefer
> the non-atomic delete on the final binding, you could implement that for
DELETE
> and you'd still implement UNBIND atomicly?

It's more a matter of server policy. I don't think we *want* to support the
atomic UNBIND functionality when deleting the last binding to a collection.
Thus our server might support UNBIND if and only if the binding being
removed is not the last one.

> ...

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Saturday, 8 March 2003 13:00:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT