W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Bindings and Locks (was: bind draft issues)

From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:34:45 -0800
Cc: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
Message-Id: <07025085-4EB3-11D7-8A8F-000393751598@xythos.com>

On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 06:24  PM, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
>
> GULP is actually pretty short, so I probably wouldn't mind
> adding a copy to the binding protocol *if* we get consensus
> that GULP correctly defines the WebDAV locking semantics.
> What I don't want to have happen is for the binding protocol
> to become a draft standard and then have RFC-2518bis decide
> that some GULP variant is needed, and have the binding RFC
> conflict with 2518bis RFC (with the resulting interoperability
> problems inevitably appearing).
>
> So I'll take this opportunity to again ask everyone to either
> explicitly support the current GULP proposal, or identify any
> problems in semantics or terminology, so we can get this
> language committed to 2518bis ASAP.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff

Geoff,

I'll get you comments RSN.

-brian
briank@xythos.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 21:34:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT