W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Bindings and Locks (was: bind draft issues)

From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:33:53 -0800
To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-Id: <868F0795-4EAA-11D7-8A8F-000393751598@xythos.com>

On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:13  PM, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
> The only argument for not doing so is that being more
> specific probably requires including the entire GULP
> document, since that is needed to clearly define the difference
> between locking a resource and protecting a URL.
> But I don't think we want to include that information by
> copy in each protocol extension document, so I think it
> is more appropriate to get it into 2518bis, and refer to
> it from the other documents.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff

Geoff,

As GULP frequently defines things in terms of bindings,
the text as-is seems more appropriate to the binding
spec.

-brian
briank@xythos.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 20:33:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT