W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: FW: ETags again - basic question

From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:13:12 -0500
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF16D37793.F4D4D564-ON05256CDF.0078FBA0@us.ibm.com>




> > Unless this were part of the spec, I'm not sure clients would notice an
> > Etag on a PROPPATCH response.  Otherwise, that's a good idea.
>
> So we may want to add this to RFC2518bis (if a PROPPATCH modifies the
etag,
> it SHOULD be returned in a PROPPATCH response).

Initially I'd say "We don't" because we have agreed previously that
changing properties
shouldn't change the etag.  I'd rather keep the message to the reader  as
simple as that.




------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569,   ccjason@us.ibm.com
I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 17:15:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT