W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: Review of ordering draft, version 05

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:09:18 -0800
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Webdav WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <004501c2d51d$5c38a820$f8cb90c6@xythoslap>

> > Actually, I agree that RFC2518 has a better error 
> marshalling mechanism
> 
> I assume that's a typo :-)

Yeah, oops, that was a typo :)


> Yes, and I think that's something that should be possibly 
> fixed in RFC3253.
> Failure to meet a postcondition (after all preconditions were 
> verified)
> always is a server bug and thus would belong into the 5xx 
> range. The main
> question is: which spec should fix that? I'd really like to 
> see RFC2518bis
> to pick up (and clarify) this kind of error typing (maybe in 
> a way that
> makes it optional?).

Seems reasonable to me, as long as it is optional. Other opinions?
Received on Saturday, 15 February 2003 13:09:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT