W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Issues: MKCOL_AND_302

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:13:00 +0200
To: "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCCEPPHKAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Geoffrey M Clemm
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:37 PM
> To: 'Webdav WG'
> Subject: RE: Issues: MKCOL_AND_302
>
>
>
> Why do you think the answer is "a"?  If the URL to which the
> 302 is redirecting the client is not mapped to a resource,
> a MKCOL to that URL can succeed (privileges permitting), so
> I would conclude that "b" is the correct answer (and therefore,
> MKCOL acts like any other method wrt 302 handling).

But a user agent never would be able to automatically forward the MKCOL to
the target, because MKCOL isn't a safe method, right?

Julian
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 08:13:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT