W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:28:26 +0200
To: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCIEONHDAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Whitehead
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 6:56 PM
> To: 'WebDAV'
> Subject: RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections
> > Therefore, my proposal is to leave this specific point undefined.
> > We'd then still need to decide whether the spec should explicitly
> > point out that the behaviour is server-dependant.
> There doesn't appear to be consensus on this issue, hence we  should leave
> out of the spec.
> That said, given that we had discussion on this issue, it makes  sense to
> and capture some of that discussion in the specification, so that
> implementors aren't operating in a total vacuum on this issue. Minimally,
> the spec. should note that this behavior is intentionally undefined.


can anybody suggest a short paragraph summarizing the situation?



<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 15:28:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT