W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Ordered collections and versioned collections

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:04:57 +0200
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "Webdav WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCOEJGGPAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 9:17 PM
> To: Webdav WG
> Subject: RE: Ordered collections and versioned collections
>
>
> ...
>
>    How about adding:
>
>    "Members that are not version-controlled MUST be moved to the
> end of the
>    ordering (in no particular order)."
>
>    This behaviour would be consistent with section 6.1 (setting
> the position
>    when no ordering information was specified).
>
> That would be fine with me, or just saying that the order of the
> non-version-controlled members is server-defined following the UPDATE.

Agreed (resolved as "server-defined"):

<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-latest
.html#rfc.issue.9.4-UPDATE-non-version-controlled-members>


--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 13:05:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT