W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.

From: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:57:11 -0800
Message-ID: <3DEC0167.2010801@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org

I agree, but at the very least a footnote should define bytes as 8-bit 
bytes... It seems trivial, but I'd wager that at least one 
implementation will be saved a lot of headache by this simple definition.


Elias


Jim Luther wrote:

> On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 06:46 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>
>> The quota draft was very briefly discussed in the WG meeting inAtlanta. 
>> ...
>> The second open issue was whether to rename the property names from 
>> “*-bytes” to “*-octets”.  The consensus of the attendees was not to 
>> bother.
>
> I still think "octets" is more accurate and that is a good reason to 
> use "octets" instead of "bytes".
> - Jim
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 19:57:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT