The quota draft was very briefly discussed in the WG meeting in Atlanta. The first open issue were how to define "quota" so that it could be flexible enough for many different implementations yet still simple enough for clients to easily use. The attendees favoured some kind of language like "quota is the maximum storage available to the current user in the current collection". This gives the quota enough context that both user-based quota systems and collection-based quota systems can represent quota with a single number. The second open issue was whether to rename the property names from "*-bytes" to "*-octets". The consensus of the attendees was not to bother. (I still don't have complete notes from the meeting but did scribble down this and some other notes myself). LisaReceived on Wednesday, 27 November 2002 21:59:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT