W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:50:19 +0100
To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, "'Clemm, Geoff'" <gclemm@rational.com>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCEEIIFNAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:34 PM
> To: 'Clemm, Geoff'; 'Webdav WG'
> Subject: RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
>
>
>
> If a client uses "If: urlA (tokenA) (Not tokenA)" then the client will
> *not* find out that their lock is invalid.   So that's not a real

Wow. You managed to completely puzzle me.

I thought that was exactly the point of this kind of request.

Can you please explain again what the issue to be solved is, or point me to
"the" mailing list message (in the archive) that explains it?

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 09:50:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT