W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:32:47 +0200
To: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCAEEHFKAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:07 PM
> To: 'Julian Reschke'; 'Stefan Eissing'; 'Webdav WG'
> Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
>
>
>
> >
> > This kind of quota system is incompatible with the quota system in a
> Unix
> > filesystem (where AFAIK it's per user) -- a standard proposal must be
> able
> > to handle these kinds of systems as well.
>
> I haven't heard of anybody implementing a WebDAV server with quota that
> needed to solve this problem.  Is there an actual implementation need
> for this?

*If* we implement quotas, they will almost certainly be user-based (at least
that's the most common quota model I'm aware of).


--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 14:33:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT