That works for me. Jason: Can you add this to the 2518 issues list? Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] So my vote would be to leave the BIND spec as it is, and to add an entry to the RFC2518 issues list saying that 4xx/5xx response bodies MAY use the DAV:error format defined in RFC3253. We could then start a separate activity to specify precondition names for common RFC2518 error conditions (such as parent collection must exist).Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 00:14:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT