W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: BIND response codes

From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:39:16 -0400
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <OF8C0CFD50.9FCF55FD-ON85256C53.006FDF55@us.ibm.com>

On Tuesday, 10/15/2002 at 07:49 ZE2, "Julian Reschke"  wrote:
> For the same reason a Unix file system by default behaves this way.
> Hard links to collections are dangerous (loops) and in most cases 
> (symlinks aka redirect refs to collections in most cases are all that's
> required).

For example, garbage collecting a file system in the presence of 
loops can be relatively expensive.

I really don't want a new status code, but if we can't find an appropriate 

existing one, I'm tentatively supportive of Julian's proposal to add one.
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2002 16:40:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:26 UTC