RE: BIND response codes

On Tuesday, 10/15/2002 at 07:49 ZE2, "Julian Reschke"  wrote:
> For the same reason a Unix file system by default behaves this way.
> 
> Hard links to collections are dangerous (loops) and in most cases 
required
> (symlinks aka redirect refs to collections in most cases are all that's
> required).

For example, garbage collecting a file system in the presence of 
loops can be relatively expensive.

I really don't want a new status code, but if we can't find an appropriate 

existing one, I'm tentatively supportive of Julian's proposal to add one.