W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: GULP (version 5)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:47:56 +0200
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCOEOAFIAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:00 PM
> To: 'Webdav WG'
> Subject: GULP (version 5)
>
> ..
>
> - If a request would modify the content or dead properties of a locked
>   resource, or would modify the bindings of a locked collection, the
>   request MUST fail unless the lock-token for that lock is submitted in
>   the request.
>
> ...

Again, this is incomplete. We really need to get to a proper definition
about what the state of a resource is.

At a minimun, it consists of:

- content
- dead properties
- internal members (for collections)

and

- *some* live properties (DAV:lockdiscovery, DAV:getcontenttype,
DAV:label-set, DAV:checked-in...)

Not that I like it but maybe any definition of live properties will have to
specify whether the property would be proteced by a lock?

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 03:48:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT