W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:25:26 +0200
To: "Jason Crawford" <nn683849@smallcue.com>, "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
Cc: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCAEFGFIAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:59 AM
> To: Clemm, Geoff
> Cc: 'Webdav WG'
> Subject: RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
>

> ...
> And if it has Etag support and it's the last PUT, you might not care
> care if you've lost the lock as long as the content has not
> been updated.  There's no point in checking for the lock in that
> situation and spec'ing  that the check be done anyway, just causes
> needless delay.
> ...

Wouldn't that mean to optimize for a *really* uncommon case? How frequently
does that happen? Does is really require special handling?

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 03:26:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:01 GMT