W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 6.3

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:26:45 +0200
To: "Jason Crawford" <nn683849@smallcue.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCEEGLFGAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford
> Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 2:56 AM
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: Re: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 6.3
>
>
>
> > 5) Section 6.3, p3
> >
> > Replace
> >
> > "However resources are free to return any URI scheme so long as it meets
> the
> > uniqueness requirements."
> >
> > by
> >
> > "However servers are free to use any IETF-registered URI scheme so long
> as
> > it meets the uniqueness requirements."
>
> ? Is it important to be IETF registered ?

Yes. A non-registered URI scheme doesn't have *any* guaranteed uniqueness,
so it doesn't serve it's stated purpose...

TAG:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-webarch-20020830/#URI-scheme



--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2002 06:27:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:01 GMT