W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:50:00 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B10841D58A@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>

I agree.

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:58 AM
To: Lisa Dusseault; Webdav WG
Subject: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting



> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 8:14 PM
> To: Webdav WG
> Subject: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting
>
> ...
> -  Be clear in spec that servers MUST do ETags. Explain how necessary
> this is to solve the lost update problem.
> ..

ETags are a good thing, correct. However, HTTP (RFC2616) doesn't require
them, RFC2518 doesn't require them, and they '*aren't* required for
interoperability. So there's no way to require them in RFC2518bis -- it
would break all servers that don't have them.

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2002 10:13:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:01 GMT