W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:42:21 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B107BC503D@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org

That warning is fine with me.  There are a variety of ways in 
which the new resource could act differently, and that is one of them.

Cheers,
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 3:31 AM
To: Jason Crawford
Cc: Clemm, Geoff; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Subject: RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities


"COPY should do the equivalent of a GET/PROPFIND followed by PUT/PROPPATCH."

I think *if* we say something like this we should warn that this may not
produce a new resource that behaves the same under variant handling (because
only one of possible multiple variants would be copied).
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Jason Crawford
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:49 PM
To: Jason Crawford
Cc: Clemm, Geoff; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Subject: RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities


Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to mark COPY_LIVE_PROPS as resolved...

Resolved: 8/1/02: COPY should do the equivalent of a GET/PROPFIND followed
by PUT/PROPPATCH. - MOVE should maintain the integrity of the resource in
that all live properties and behaviors should remain live and have the same
semantics at the new location as at the old location. If there is any doubt
"same" is defined according to the resource author's concept of "this
resource".

If you'd like this changed, just speak up. :-)

J.


------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569
Received on Friday, 2 August 2002 08:42:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:01 GMT