RE: New RFC2518bis draft, LOCK_URL_WITH_NO_PARENT_COLLECTION

This is the standard wording throughout 2518, cut-and-pasted into the
new status paragraph.  Do you think the wording should change
throughout?  I think it's sufficiently clear although not optimally
clear.

 

lisa

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Crawford [mailto:ccjason@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:44 AM
To: Lisa Dusseault
Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Subject: RE: New RFC2518bis draft, LOCK_URL_WITH_NO_PARENT_COLLECTION

 

I think there is a word missing in the new text. I suspect it's "parent"
although that by itself doesn't quite fit either.

409 (Conflict) - A resource cannot be created at the destination until
one or more intermediate [parent] collections have been created.


------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com