- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:25:16 -0400
- To: "Webdav WG (E-mail)" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
That sounds good to me. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Jason Crawford [mailto:ccjason@us.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:25 PM To: Lisa Dusseault Cc: Webdav WG (E-mail) Subject: Re: New RFC2518bis draft, LOCK_REFRESH_BY_METHODS The current wording is difficult to understand. I'd suggest that the wording be changed from... The timeout counter SHOULD NOT be restarted any time an owner of the lock sends a method to any member of the lock, including unsupported methods, or methods which are unsuccessful. However the lock MUST be refreshed if a refresh LOCK method is successfully received. To simply say... The timeout counter SHOULD only be restarted if a refresh LOCK method is successfully received. If you like, we can mention that this is a change from 2518. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 13:25:49 UTC