W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Issue: LOCKDISCOVERY_FORMAT_FOR_MULTIPLE_SHARED_LOCKS

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 08:05:52 +0200
To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEMMEJAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:45 PM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
> Subject: Issue: LOCKDISCOVERY_FORMAT_FOR_MULTIPLE_SHARED_LOCKS
>
>
>
> See the following posting.  In it Julian suggests that we clarify the
> format of the lockdiscovery property if a resource if under the influence
> of multiple shared locks.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2002JanMar/0215.html
>
> Do we feel that this is necessary?  If so, what do you suggest?

Jason,

back when I wrote this the point was to

- report the bug in IIS and

- have the bug description archived.

I don't think that RFC2518 really needs to be changed. However, a sample for
DAV:lockdiscovery for a resource with shared locks wouldn't hurt.
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2002 02:06:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:00 GMT