> It does mean requiring that clients resolve XML namespaces on attribute > names, which hasn't be necessary so far to implement a DAV client (in my > experience anyway); possible interoperability issues there. > > I'll implement this source-set proposal sometime this week hopefully, > given that nobody else objects to using XLink. In this case I think we should be compatible with the XLink syntax. As members of the broader community of Web standards developers, we should be consistent with existing relevant standards, unless we have a strong reason for deviating. Since most clients do not currently support the source property, I suspect the interoperability issues won't be very significant. - Jim PS - I can't wait until Yaron sees we have added another XML attribute into the DAV spec :-)Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 16:19:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:00 GMT