I should think that what you have is machine readable as well, or am I missing some critical bit here? If the specification says to provide a RFC XXXX compliant URI for the source link, as below, I will bet that my machine (read client software) can read it with little extra effort. Elias Joe Orton wrote: > I just dropped the xlink: from the href attribute, and got rid of the > xlink:role attribute entirely, giving e.g.: > > <D:prop> > <D:source-set> > <D:source href="http://example.com/dav/source.xml">Source</D:source> > <D:source href="http://example.com/dav/render.xsl">Stylesheet</D:source> > <D:source href="http://example.com/dav/etc.etc"/> > </D:source-set> > </D:prop> > > which should satisfy your first and third requirements; I'm not sure > about "machine-readable" link descriptions being mandatory. My client > doesn't need to understand anything about the link, I just want it to be > able to display a menu of "URI: description" choices when there is >1 > source available, so that the user can decide. > > (Similarly, the minimum amount of server configuration I'd like to > require is saying e.g. "/dav/render.xsl is a source of /dav/*.xml") > > Regards, > > joeReceived on Monday, 13 May 2002 18:59:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:00 GMT