RE: Issue: COPYMOVE_LOCKED_STATUS_CODE_CLARIFICATION

• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 21:29:53 +0200
• To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "WebDAV" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCIEMAEIAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:11 PM
> To: WebDAV
> Subject: RE: Issue: COPYMOVE_LOCKED_STATUS_CODE_CLARIFICATION
> 
> 
> I don't think that it makes sense to try to re-use
> DAV:response in the "explanation" part of the error message,
> because you don't need another responsedescription,
> and it is not clear that the HTTP status codes are a
> useful way of characterizing what about the state of
> the other resource contributed to the error being described.

Well, we need 

- the URI and
- error information (be it an HTTP status or a DAV:error element).

DAV:response is a container that can hold both, so why not re-use it?

Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 15:30:26 UTC