Roy, > In other words, I think that "scheme:" is only a valid identifier for the > namespace if the scheme defines it as such. What are you suggesting here? Where would a scheme define it as such? Would this require a change to 2396 that you'd support? Or some place else? J.Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2001 16:23:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT