W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: RFC2518 issue with lockdiscovery/activelock/owner

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:59:45 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B10465258F@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
How do you define "the actual owner of a lock" in an interoperable way?
What would a client do with that information?

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]

I would be interested to work on this definition. I think it's essential
that a server can provide enough information to a client to discover the
actual owner of a lock, no matter whether and what *his* client has
submitted as DAV:owner. First tests show that extending DAV:activelock with
new child elements didn't have any negative impact of MS Office and Adobe
GoLive.
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2001 09:00:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:56 GMT