W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: Comments regarding locking & auto-checkin...

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:49:47 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B103F8AB4B@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
   From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com]

   [Should] a more explicit error code should be returned when an If
   header specifies a lock which has timed-out rather than an invalid
   lock, I believe that at the moment a client cannot tell the

I believe most servers do not store "used to be locked by" information
with a resource, so it would be very difficult for them to distinguish
between a lock which timed out and a lock with does not exist.

But in any case, why would a client really care about this distinction?

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 17:41:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:23 UTC