W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Possible minor correction for MOVE Example in RFC 2518

From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:35:47 -0400
To: "Hall, Shaun" <Shaun.Hall@GBR.XEROX.COM>, "'W3C WebDAV Mailing List'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF341D9D98.AE4440C1-ON85256A9A.00768942@pok.ibm.com>


Entered on the issues list.  I assume no discussion is necessary...

------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569,   ccjason@us.ibm.com


"Hall, Shaun" <Shaun.Hall@GBR.XEROX.COM>@w3.org on 07/25/2001 10:55:26 AM

Sent by:  w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org


To:   "'W3C WebDAV Mailing List'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
cc:
Subject:  Possible minor correction for MOVE Example in RFC 2518


Couldn't see anything about this in the issues list and its minor.

RFC2518 Section 8.9.6 Example of MOVE request.

In the description below the example, it states "This means that the
resource /container/C2/ could not be moved. However because there was an
error copying /container/C2, none of the /containerC2's members were
copied".

Er shouldn't the words "copying" and "copied" in the description be changed
to "moving" and "moved" respectively as its a MOVE request ?

The MOVE example appears to be a cut/paste/modify of the COPY example in
sec
8.8.8, which would explain things. Mmm, when have you seen that before ? Oh
yes, writing source code :-)

Cheers

Shaun Hall
Xerox Europe
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 17:36:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:56 GMT