Alan Kent <ajk@mds.rmit.edu.au> wrote: > One comment - it says that XML namespace semantics are the > same as those of WebDAV. Talking to people locally seems > to indicate that the WebDAV interpretation of XML namespaces > is not conformant to the XML namespace recommendation. Should > ACL base the namespace interpretation on WebDAV, or on the > XML namespaces specification? The ACL spec explicitly references > the WebDAV RFC by number, so if a new WebDAV spec came along > supporting the "official" XML namespace interpretation, then > the spec would be out of date already. (Not a big deal - and > probably no solution.) RFC2518 has to be read in conjunction with the issues list cum addendum which is at http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/webdav/protocol/issues.html (in particular see XML_NS) Regards, TimReceived on Wednesday, 4 July 2001 05:41:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:56 GMT