W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: lock tagging

From: Jim Amsden <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:44:51 -0500
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Message-ID: <OFCFAF9573.F62A8C80-ON852569F3.0050C82F@raleigh.ibm.com>
2)  /foo is a directory with no contents and is locked depth infinity
    PUT to /foo/bar, does this require a tagged list for the lock token
specifying /foo or will un untagged list work as well.

The lock token is required because /foo is locked, and PUT to /foo/bar adds
a new member. It doesn't matter if the collection is empty or not, depth
infinity or not. Depth infinity only means that /foo/bar inherits the lock.
The tag list is only needed if the request must provide different lock
tokens for more than one resource. In this case, only /foo needs a lock
token, so an untagged list will work too.
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2001 09:49:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:55 GMT