>> Arrgh, where did this idea that a resource must "physically >> exist" come >> from?? [snip] > A few people interpret 2) and 3) to mean that a null resource doesn't > physically exist, which IMHO is convenient. Convenience was certainly my intention. Shaun's perfectly described the sense in which I originally meant 'physically exist'. Given that the original question to which I replied asked what a locked-null resource was for, and if an example could be given, it seemed the most appropriate phrase to use. Mike EvansReceived on Friday, 15 June 2001 10:30:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:56 GMT