W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR

From: Eric Sedlar <Eric.Sedlar@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 22:58:21 -0700
To: "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLFOFMCKOOMBDHDBKGEJECBAA.Eric.Sedlar@oracle.com>
I agree.  There is no reason not to persist attributes.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Mark A. Hale
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 6:29 PM
> To: WebDAV WG
> Subject: RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
>
>
> Jim:  Thanks for getting the issues list started.
>
> I believe that WebDAV must permit properties to have attributes.
> As you've
> pointed out, RDF and PRISM do use them extensively.  A server can reformat
> the attributes in a subsequent PROPFIND request.  Attrbiutes should be
> persistent.
>
> 	Thanks,
>
> 	Mark
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Whitehead
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:54 PM
> > To: WebDAV WG
> > Subject: Issue: PROP_ATTR
> >
> >
> > As mentioned in a previous post, now is the time to start
> resolving issues
> > on the RFC 2518 issues list.  As fate would have it, the first
> > issue on the
> > list is one that has been contentious in the past. Can we come to
> > consensus
> > on it now?
> >
> > Issue: PROP_ATTR
> >
> > Description:
> >
> > What is a WebDAV server required to do with XML attributes other than
> > xml:lang submitted with a PROPPATCH?  This affects how well
> WebDAV will be
> > able to support RDF, since RDF uses attributes extensively.
> >
> > Greg Stein originally raised this issue:
> >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0089.html
> >
> > See also:
> >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0092.html
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0094.html
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0095.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2001 02:04:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:55 GMT