An issue regarding a LOCK response code in RFC2518. A quick search in the archives didn't show anything about this. In section 8.10.4, it states "If the lock cannot be granted to all resources, a 409 (Conflict) status code MUST be returned with a response entity body containing a multi-status XML element...". 1) The 409 status code is not listed in section 8.10.7 (LOCK status codes). 2) The example in section 8.10.10 (Multi-resource LOCK request which fails) returns a 207 (Multi-status) response code, not a 409. The 207 response is normal for WebDAV methods that need to provide information about multiple-resources. I'm inclined to think the 207 is the correct response in such a failure case, which at first implies the 409 is wrong. However, I think the only case where a 409 is applicable is if one it trying to "create" a Lock Null Resource (LNR) (i.e. the null-resource does not exist) and where the ancestors of the LNR do not exist. I think this would be consistent with other methods as well (e.g. PUT, COPY, MOVE). Comments/clarification/etc please. Regards Shaun Hall Xerox EuropeReceived on Thursday, 23 November 2000 07:25:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:55 GMT