Re: DAV:executable ?

> * is there a more general semantic to use? e.g. all permission types
>   rather than just executable?

This is my worry. Are people going to come along and say "But I want my
scripts to be chmod 0700" (or whatever)? I'm more tempted by a
"unix-permissions" type property, and allowing access to the real file
permissions as an octal value.

Regards,

joe