W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: WebDAV proxy problems

From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:52:57 -0800 (PST)
To: "Lisa Lippert (Dusseault)" <lisal@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001271450480.9267-100000@nebula.lyra.org>
Yes, it definitely has a place there. Somebody named Aengus was looking
into this back into December, and was going to provide all the information
(and a web page). Never got the info, though.

I'll set up a page today or tomorrow and put the information that we have
on it.

Cheers,
-g

On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) wrote:

> Would this information be suitable on a page for the webdav.org site?  Might
> even put some pressure on proxy developers to support RFC 2518, and to allow
> their administrators to name additional methods that should be allowed over
> HTTP (e.g. so that new advanced collections or DASL commands can be added).
> 
> Lisa
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Orton [mailto:joe@orton.demon.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 5:10 AM
> To: Lisa Lippert (Dusseault)
> Cc: 'David Engberg'; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: Re: WebDAV proxy problems
> 
> 
> > I actually started collecting some information on this.  Since I don't
> have
> > testing resources for it, it's only hearsay, but here goes:
> > 
> > Known Proxies that support DAV
> > 
> >  - MS Proxy 2.0: Support for DAV is built-in to MS Proxy 2.0.
> >  - Squid: There is a patch for the Squid proxy server that adds support
> for
> > WebDAV (http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.2/bugs/).
> 
> Apache mod_proxy works fine too. IIRC Squid 2.3 will pass through the
> methods defined in 2518, but will still block methods it doesn't
> understand. 
> 
> joe
> 

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2000 17:53:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:53 GMT